Technical Product Owner.
I turn operational problems into clear product requirements and working AI, data and automation products.
I work across discovery, workflow design, prioritisation, implementation and delivery—connecting business needs with technical execution.
Open to Product Owner, Junior Product Manager, Product Operations, Implementation and AI/Data Product roles.
From problem to working product.
I identify the operational problem, define the user and business outcome, translate it into requirements, work through implementation and validate whether the result solves the original problem.
Professional evidence of product delivery.
Work at the intersection of business requirements, operational users, data and implementation.
Operational data for better sales, inventory and distribution decisions.
Standardised customer data, improved recurring reporting and helped turn operational questions into clearer KPIs and replenishment decisions.
Selected product work.
Products I have founded, delivered for clients, prototyped and tested across AI, data and operational workflows.
MeetBook → Nimo
Nimo is a private event contact book that helps people capture who they meet, remember the context behind each connection and follow up after the event.
Originally developed as MeetBook, the product is now evolving into Nimo ahead of its October 2026 launch.
Bidly
A local-services marketplace where customers post a job, nearby providers bid, and the customer chooses using price, ratings, reviews and availability.
ContractGuard AI
A working prototype for teams that need to turn uploaded contracts into structured deadlines, risk signals and reviewable information.

ACPT
An assurance product for enterprise teams that need workflow monitoring, investigation and audit evidence around AI-agent outcomes.

ORB Market Research Pipeline
A research pipeline for analysts exploring five-minute QQQ market data around the New York opening range.

- Python
- SQL
- Power BI
- TypeScript
- React
- React Native
- Expo
- Supabase
- PostgreSQL
- REST APIs
- n8n
- OpenAI
- Claude
- Codex
- Cursor
- GitHub
- Jupyter
- Data Validation
- Workflow Automation
How I work with AI.
I use AI coding tools for speed, but the system around them matters more: context before execution, bounded tasks, acceptance criteria, testing, guardrails and human judgement over architecture and product decisions.
From discovery through delivery.
Capabilities demonstrated through professional workflow improvement, founder-led product work, client delivery and technical prototypes.
Understand the problem
User and stakeholder needs, problem definition, workflow mapping and requirement clarification.
Shape the right scope
Product requirements, user stories, acceptance criteria, scope decisions and prioritisation.
Move work to completion
Roadmap planning, backlog organisation, cross-functional coordination, testing and iteration.
Design informed workflows
Data analysis, AI workflow design, automation and outcome validation.
Connect product and engineering
APIs, integrations, data models, frontend/backend understanding and technical documentation.
Validate and improve
Product validation, feedback loops, metrics and iteration planning.
Posts, lessons & experiments.
Public thinking from LinkedIn — read it here, then open the thread if you want the rest.
LinkedIn profile ↗Validate before you finish building.
I went into the hackathon thinking the hard part was building fast. I left realizing that when software can be built in days, you can also build the wrong thing in days.
Open on LinkedIn ↗I went into SummerUP thinking the hard part was building fast. I left realizing that building fast might actually be the dangerous part. Because when software can be built in days, you can also build the wrong thing in days.
One lesson stuck: validate before you finish building. Talk to potential customers before the product is done. Ask questions. Get on calls. Understand how they deal with the problem today and whether what you’re building actually matters to them.
The idea I was working on was ACPT — governance and control for AI agents. Being surrounded by people from different industries changed the question from “Can I build this?” to “Should I build this?”
Two days ago I attended the Engineering AI Together Unconference at the Merantix AI Campus in Berlin — speaking with AI engineers, sharing VoiceOps, and getting honest feedback.
The conversations moved from benchmarking, multi-agent workflows and security into product decisions. One person asked why VoiceOps should be desktop-first when most people already use voice assistants on their phones. A fair question — and it made me think more carefully about the environment the product is actually meant to be used in.
Last Friday I joined Build Fridays in Berlin, hosted by AI BEAVERS, to advance the product direction and technical foundation for VoiceOps.
I used the session for focused product discovery with engineers — workflows, pain points, workarounds, privacy concerns, desktop vs mobile. The result was not a feature list. It was a clearer product direction, a validated MVP focus, and an architecture aligned with the highest-value user needs.
Let’s work on
something difficult.
If you’re hiring for applied AI, digital systems or automation, I’d be happy to talk.
